BREAKING: Judge Boasberg says a grand jury is not allowed to see documents related to Jerome Pow...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
Mila Joy is a conservative commentator on X (formerly Twitter) known for posting breaking news alerts with a strong partisan slant favoring right-wing narratives. Her style is sensational and accusatory, often portraying judicial decisions as biased against conservative figures. Credibility is low due to frequent exaggeration and lack of neutral sourcing, as seen in her portrayal of Judge Boasberg as a 'partisan hack'.
What's This About?
The post claims Judge James Boasberg ruled that a grand jury cannot access documents on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's alleged overspending of billions in taxpayer funds on headquarters renovations, framing it as protection for Powell. In reality, Boasberg quashed DOJ subpoenas issued under U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, ruling they were a pretext to harass Powell into lowering interest rates or resigning amid Trump administration pressure[1][2][3]. Pirro is appealing, calling the judge partisan and arguing it blocks grand jury investigation into false statements and fraud[1][3]. Key themes include accusations of judicial bias, Fed independence, and political weaponization of DOJ probes.
🔥Why It's Trending
This content is trending due to the fresh March 13, 2026, unsealing of Boasberg's ruling, igniting debates on Fed autonomy versus government oversight amid high interest rates and economic tensions[1][2]. Timing coincides with Powell's term nearing expiration in May 2026 and Pirro's immediate appeal announcement, fueling partisan clashes[3]. Relevance spikes as it ties into broader narratives of Trump-era DOJ actions and potential Fed Chair replacement.
💡Fun Facts
- 1Judge Boasberg sarcastically noted DOJ's probe was as thin as investigating Powell for 'mail fraud because someone once saw him send a letter'[1].
- 2The subpoenas targeted a $2.5 billion Fed headquarters renovation, but Boasberg found no evidence of crimes beyond 'displeasing the President'[2][3].
- 3Pirro's office launched the probe last year over Powell's congressional testimony on costs[2].
- 4Boasberg acknowledged no direct precedent but ruled 'a novel improper purpose is improper all the same'[1].
- 5Senator Tillis threatened to block Trump's Fed nominee until the probe ends[3].
📚Read More
← Swipe to see more →
More Trending on Twitter
Do you have to be able to pass a basic American History test to be in Congress? Apparently not. S...
Do you have to be able to pass a basic American History test to be in Congress? Apparently not. She thinks World War II is World War Eleven. A proud product of The Learing Center. https://t.co/X9yCM4zfef
by John Rich🇺🇸
Say his name and he appears! @joehendry will be LIVE in concert TONIGHT on #WWERaw! 📍: Laredo...
Say his name and he appears! @joehendry will be LIVE in concert TONIGHT on #WWERaw! 📍: Laredo, TX 🎟️: https://t.co/yz7PNZVcix 📺: 8 ET/5 PT on @netflix https://t.co/CJEJe6Z1xJ
by WWE
Sure what Jimmy Kimmel said was over the line, but I just think he should be fired because his sh...
Sure what Jimmy Kimmel said was over the line, but I just think he should be fired because his show sucks and he’s a shit comedian.
by Brandon Herrera