🚨 BREAKING: US Attorney Pirro says Activist Judge Boasberg took an UNPRECEDENTED step to BLOCK a...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
Nick Sortor is a conservative commentator and content creator known for posting breaking news and opinion pieces critical of judicial and government actions from a right-leaning perspective. His style is alarmist and partisan, often amplifying stories involving Trump administration figures with dramatic language to engage conservative audiences. Credibility is mixed, as he frequently cites Fox News personalities like Jeanine Pirro but lacks independent journalistic verification.
What's This About?
The post claims U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro accused Judge James Boasberg of improperly blocking a grand jury subpoena for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's records amid missing tax dollars, framing it as an unprecedented attack on investigative powers.[1][2] In reality, Boasberg ruled the DOJ subpoenas were pretextual harassment to pressure Powell into lowering interest rates or resigning, citing zero evidence of crime and abundant proof of political retaliation by the Trump administration.[1][3] Pirro vowed to appeal, invoking Supreme Court precedent on grand jury discretion, while the probe originated from Powell's congressional testimony on a $2.5 billion Fed headquarters renovation overrun.[2][4]
🔥Why It's Trending
This content is trending due to the fresh March 13, 2026, court ruling blocking DOJ subpoenas, reigniting debates over Fed independence amid Trump's pressure on Powell for rate cuts.[3][4] Timing aligns with ongoing tensions between the administration and the judiciary, amplified by Pirro's fiery response and conservative influencers like Sortor.[1] Relevance spikes as it ties into economic policy fights and accusations of activist judging during a period of high interest rates.
💡Fun Facts
- 1Judge Boasberg described the subpoenas as having 'essentially zero evidence' of crime but a 'mountain of evidence' of retaliation against Powell.[2]
- 2The DOJ probe stemmed from Powell's testimony on a $2.5 billion Fed HQ renovation, not $1 billion in 'missing tax dollars' as claimed.[1][4]
- 3Powell released a rare video in January calling the investigation politically motivated to influence Fed policy.[4]
- 4Senate Republicans like Thom Tillis urged dropping the probe, calling it a 'failed attack on Fed independence.'[2]
- 5Pirro's office is appealing, potentially escalating to higher courts amid Trump-era clashes with the Fed.[3]
📚Read More
Boasberg blocks subpoenas against Fed Chair Jerome Powell
Judge Boasberg described the Department of Justice's effort as an attempt to pressure Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates or resigning.
Judge blocks subpoenas in Fed Chair Jerome Powell probe citing 'essentially zero evidence'
A federal judge blocked subpoenas issued by the Justice Department against Fed Chair Jerome Powell after determining the government "produced essentially zero evidence."
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/13/court-blocks-dojs-probe-of-fed-chair-jerome-powell-00828448
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAUSbAWcCbs
← Swipe to see more →
More Trending on Twitter
Handshake Gate continues. This time it’s Josh Naylor vs. Cal Raleigh https://t.co/1icif1Fk6i
Handshake Gate continues. This time it’s Josh Naylor vs. Cal Raleigh https://t.co/1icif1Fk6i
by Talkin' Baseball
Cal Raleigh sigue en los suyo, no saludó a su compañero Josh Naylor. 📹 @LuisGilbertLop https...
Cal Raleigh sigue en los suyo, no saludó a su compañero Josh Naylor. 📹 @LuisGilbertLop https://t.co/4ePWAwoIpT
by Miguel Lugo
#SmackDown https://t.co/ELYHrEFoEV
#SmackDown https://t.co/ELYHrEFoEV
by Cody Rhodes