Dear Supreme Court Justices: Your job is to follow the law. Even when it’s politically difficul...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
Mike Davis is a conservative legal commentator and former Senate Judiciary Committee chief counsel, known for his bold, unapologetic style criticizing judicial overreach and progressive policies. He frequently posts provocative takes on constitutional issues, amassing a large following among right-leaning audiences. His credibility stems from his legal background, though his rhetoric often prioritizes advocacy over neutral analysis.
What's This About?
The post urges Supreme Court Justices to strictly interpret the law on birthright citizenship, claiming it does not apply to children of undocumented immigrants under the 14th Amendment. It emphasizes that 'We The People' as sovereign citizens did not intend this benefit for 'illegals' and that any changes should come through Congress, referencing historical adjustments for American Indians. Key themes include originalism, judicial restraint versus activism, immigration policy, and criticism of perceived judicial 'caping' for political outcomes.
🔥Why It's Trending
This post is trending amid heightened debates on immigration reform and potential Supreme Court challenges to birthright citizenship in 2026, possibly tied to upcoming cases or executive actions. Its timing aligns with political tensions around border policies and originalist jurisprudence. The sharp, meme-like rhetoric resonates widely on platforms like X, amplifying conservative frustrations with judicial decisions.
💡Fun Facts
- 1The 14th Amendment's 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' clause has been interpreted to exclude children of diplomats and invading armies, but courts have upheld birthright citizenship for undocumented immigrants since 1898's United States v. Wong Kim Ark.
- 2Birthright citizenship was explicitly extended to American Indians via the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, after they were initially excluded despite tribal sovereignty.
- 3President Trump attempted to end birthright citizenship via executive order in 2018, but it was never implemented due to legal challenges.
- 4Over 90% of countries worldwide do not offer unconditional birthright citizenship, relying instead on jus sanguinis (right of blood).
- 5The phrase 'wear robes, not capes' mocks justices as superheroes bending law for politics, a popular conservative trope post-Roe v. Wade overturn.
📚Read More
← Swipe to see more →
More Trending on Twitter
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: Did I understand you to say that domicile is controlled by Congres...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: Did I understand you to say that domicile is controlled by Congress? Trump's Solicitor General Sauer: Congress can't dictate certain classes of people lack the legal capacity to form a legally binding domicile. Jackson: My understanding was the framers put this citizenship clause into the Constitution to prevent future Congresses from affecting citizenship in this way. Sauer: I... uh, uhhh... no I don't think so.
by Headquarters
Donald Trump’s attorney Solicitor General John Sauer needing to “think” about whether or not Nati...
Donald Trump’s attorney Solicitor General John Sauer needing to “think” about whether or not Native Americans are American citizens while arguing against birthright citizenship in front of the Supreme Court is absolutely wild. https://t.co/rcplkZSdb0
by Art Candee 🍿🥤
Remember April Fools Day in 2015 when CERN said they accidentally destroyed our old universe and ...
Remember April Fools Day in 2015 when CERN said they accidentally destroyed our old universe and trapped us inside a parallel reality? These people have a weird sense of humor… https://t.co/SoIsSo0p67
by Nick Hinton