Do you support Rep. Thomas Massie publicly reading Epstein’s client list if Pam Bondi’s DOJ refus...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
Never JD Vance 🇺🇸 is an X account run by a vocal critic of JD Vance and certain Republican figures, often posting provocative political content with a libertarian or anti-establishment slant. Their style features bold, direct questions to rally support on controversial issues like government transparency. Credibility is limited as an anonymous partisan voice, relying on hot-button topics rather than verified reporting.
What's This About?
The post poses a yes/no question asking if users support Rep. Thomas Massie publicly reading Jeffrey Epstein’s client list if Pam Bondi’s DOJ refuses to unredact names, amid ongoing bipartisan efforts by Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA).[1][2][3] It stems from the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed in November 2025, which mandates DOJ release of files with limited redactions, but the duo recently discovered six redacted names—including billionaire Leslie Wexner and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem—after reviewing unredacted documents.[1][3] Key themes include demands for accountability on Epstein's elite associates, accusations of DOJ cover-ups under the Trump administration, and calls for congressional intervention to expose potential co-conspirators in child sex trafficking investigations.[2][3]
🔥Why It's Trending
This post is trending due to recent high-profile actions by Massie and Khanna in early February 2026, where they named six redacted men from Epstein files after a DOJ visit, fueling public outrage over perceived elite protections.[1][3] Timing aligns with Khanna reading the names on the House floor and Massie's posts highlighting Wexner as a 'co-conspirator,' amplifying transparency demands amid Pam Bondi's DOJ role.[2][3] Relevance spikes with Epstein case's enduring fascination and bipartisan push against government secrecy.
💡Fun Facts
- 1Reps. Massie and Khanna found six hidden names in just two hours of reviewing 3 million Epstein files, prompting speculation of many more cover-ups.[1][3]
- 2Leslie Wexner, Victoria's Secret billionaire, was labeled a 'co-conspirator' in a 2019 FBI document for child sex trafficking, though he claims full cooperation.[1][3]
- 3The bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed by President Trump in November 2025, but critics say DOJ still violates its redaction limits.[2]
- 4Massie faced Trump backlash, called a 'moron' at the National Prayer Breakfast, yet persists on Epstein transparency.[2]
- 5DOJ partially unredacted files only after Massie pointed them out, including an Epstein email about a 'torture video' to Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem.[1][3]
📚Read More
← Swipe to see more →

More Trending on Twitter
and lost pied piper to a REPUBLICAN STATE MIND YOU https://t.co/kmBzc1VkzF
and lost pied piper to a REPUBLICAN STATE MIND YOU https://t.co/kmBzc1VkzF
by 𝙗𝙧𝙞 ⁷
Now who the fuck told you to give your children’s college fund to NATE JACOBS of all people ???? ...
Now who the fuck told you to give your children’s college fund to NATE JACOBS of all people ???? #euphoria https://t.co/iVTmeM8clK
by Kenny
🐿️the song is good 🐰you don’t remember your part at all do you hyung? 🐨sorry, I forgot it 🐰wh...
🐿️the song is good 🐰you don’t remember your part at all do you hyung? 🐨sorry, I forgot it 🐰why is pied piper so popular? 🐥we’re grateful that you like it 🐹if army likes it, that’s all that matters 🐱 it’s good, right? 🐨 This is awesome https://t.co/UyrHLAQTO2
by ⁷
