đ¨HOLY SHIT: Kristi Noem just called the Minneapolis woman a terrorist- claiming ICE agents were ...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
CALL TO ACTIVISM is a progressive social media advocacy account that focuses on U.S. politics, human rights, and holding conservative officials publicly accountable. Their style is urgent, emotionally charged, and highly critical of right-wing politicians, often using viral threads and sharp language to mobilize followers for political action. The account is influential among liberal and anti-Trump audiences, but its content is clearly opinionated rather than neutral reporting.
What's This About?
This content is about South Dakota Gov. and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem calling the Minneapolis woman shot and killed by an ICE agent an "act of domestic terrorism" and defending the shooting as self-defense during an enforcement action in snowy conditions.[1] The post contrasts Noemâs framing with bystander accounts and emerging media coverage that question whether deadly force was justified when the woman, identified by family as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, allegedly used her vehicle near the agents.[1][2] It taps into a broader debate over use of force against moving vehicles and long-standing concerns about ICE tactics and federal immigration enforcement.[1][3] The tweetâs language (âcomplicit monsterâ) underscores anger at Noemâs characterization of Good as a terrorist and reflects a deep partisan divide over policing, immigration, and protest.
đĽWhy It's Trending
This is trending because the Minneapolis ICE shooting has rapidly become a national flashpoint, with viral bystander videos, protests, and sharply conflicting narratives between Noemâs Justice Department and community advocates.[1][2][3] The use of the term "domestic terrorism" against a local resident, combined with allegations she was shot multiple times in the face, has intensified outrage on social platforms and drawn widespread media coverage.[1][2] The postâs blunt, profane framing and alignment with broader anti-ICE sentiment help it spread quickly among politically engaged users.
đĄFun Facts
- 1Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem publicly labeled the incident an "act of domestic terrorism" and said the ICE officer "followed his training" and acted defensively to protect himself and others.[1]
- 2The woman killed has been identified by family as Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old Minneapolis resident described by loved ones as a poet, writer, and devoted neighbor.[2]
- 3The shooting occurred amid a major escalation of immigration enforcement in Minnesota, with 2,000 ICE agents and officers recently deployed to the area.[1][3]
- 4Experts in police use-of-force policies have cited this case as a particularly troubling example in the ongoing debate about when, if ever, officers should shoot at moving vehicles.[1]
- 5Community members and civil rights advocates at a vigil rejected Noemâs description of Good as a terrorist, portraying her instead as someone who was present to protect neighbors from what they view as federal overreach.[2][3]
đRead More
Minneapolis shooting by ICE agent brings debate over police force and moving vehicles back in focus
The fatal shooting Wednesday of a woman by an immigration and customs enforcement agent in Minneapolis is raising questions about when law enforcement officers are justified in using lethal force against someone in a moving vehicle.
https://www.startribune.com/she-was-an-amazing-human-being-mother-identifies-woman-shot-killed-by-ice-agent/601559922
ICE killing in Minneapolis sparks mass outrage : Peoples Dispatch
The killing occurred one day after 2,000 ICE agents were deployed into the city. Trump administration officials accuse the victim of having committed domestic terrorism.
â Swipe to see more â
More Trending on Twitter
@BeigeFrequency Community Note: Cole Allen donated via ActBlue to Kamala Harris for President. ...
@BeigeFrequency Community Note: Cole Allen donated via ActBlue to Kamala Harris for President. If youâre going to lie, make sure we donât have receipts. https://t.co/m0wDJ8XkeF
by ThePersistence
Cole Allen, the 31-year-old WHCD shooter, sent a manifesto to family members about 10 minutes bef...
Cole Allen, the 31-year-old WHCD shooter, sent a manifesto to family members about 10 minutes before opening fire at Saturday nightâs White House Correspondentsâ Dinner, calling himself the âFriendly Federal Assassinâ and saying he was trying to kill Trump administration officials, The New York Post reports âTurning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. Iâm not the person raped in a detention camp. Iâm not the fisherman executed without trial,â Allen wrote in the document, which a relative provided to police, a U.S. official said. âI am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes,â he wrote.
by Republicans against Trump
đşđ¸ The full manifesto of WHCD gunman Cole Allen has been obtained by the New York Post. Key tak...
đşđ¸ The full manifesto of WHCD gunman Cole Allen has been obtained by the New York Post. Key takeaways: - A 31-year-old California teacher who described himself as "half-black, half-white" - Sent the 1,052-word document to family 10 minutes before the attack - Targeted Trump administration officials by rank, explicitly excluded Kash Patel - Used buckshot deliberately to minimize collateral casualties - Described Secret Service security as "actually insane" and said he walked in with multiple weapons undetected - "If I was an Iranian agent instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed" - Ended the manifesto: "It's awful. I want to throw up. Can't really recommend it. Stay in school, kids." Full manifesto: "Hello everybody! So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused. I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for âMost Wanted.â I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.) I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near. I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure. I donât expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies. On to why I did any of this: I am a citizen of the United States of America. What my representatives do reflects on me. And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes. (Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity Iâve had to do something about it.) While Iâm discussing this, Iâll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but Iâm not military so too bad.) Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope theyâre wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *arenât* Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me) Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security National Guard: same as Hotel Security Hotel Employees: not targets at all Guests: not targets at all In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls) I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesnât come to that. Rebuttals to objections: Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek. Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. Iâm not the person raped in a detention camp. Iâm not the fisherman executed without trial. Iâm not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration. Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressorâs crimes. Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this. Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isnât about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be âinconvenientâ for people who arenât the victim? This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with. Objection 3: You didnât get them all. Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere. Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldnât be the one doing this. Rebuttal: I donât see anyone else picking up the slack Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesarâs. Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered. I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.) Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years. Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years. Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism. Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning. Thank you to the many acquaintances Iâve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration. Thank you all for everything. Sincerely, Cole âcoldForceâ âFriendly Federal Assassinâ Allen PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone. Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo. What I got (who knows, maybe theyâre pranking me!) is nothing. No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event. Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance. I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat. The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before. Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope itâs corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again. Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit. Actually insane. Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: itâs awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done. Canât really recommend it! Stay in school, kids." Source: New York Post
by Mario Nawfal