Jack Smith on if Trump's statements were free speech: He was free to say that he thought he won t...
Watch the Original
Engagement Metrics
About the Creator
Blue Georgia is a political commentary account focused on Georgia state politics and national political developments. The account shares news, analysis, and quotes related to Democratic perspectives and political events.
What's This About?
This content features a statement from Special Counsel Jack Smith distinguishing between protected free speech and criminal conduct in Trump's post-2020 election actions. Smith explains that while Trump had the constitutional right to claim he won the election—even falsely—he was not permitted to knowingly use false statements about election fraud to obstruct government functions and undermine the certification process. The quote encapsulates the legal distinction between political speech and criminal conspiracy that underpinned the charges brought against Trump.
🔥Why It's Trending
This content is trending following Jack Smith's January 2025 release of his final report on Trump investigations, which includes detailed documentation of the charges and legal reasoning behind the indictments. The quote directly addresses the intersection of First Amendment protections and criminal liability, a contentious debate during Trump's 2024 campaign and post-election period.
💡Fun Facts
- 1Jack Smith brought charges under four federal statutes, including conspiracy to obstruct government function, obstruction of official proceedings, and conspiracy to violate citizens' voting rights[1]
- 2Smith secured a second grand jury indictment after the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling in summer 2024, demonstrating sufficient evidence remained for prosecution[3]
- 3Trump made false election fraud claims even after losing numerous court cases, being told by advisors the claims were false, and admitting privately he lost the election[1]
- 4Smith's superseding indictment specifically emphasized Trump's actions 'not as President but in his capacity as a candidate for office' to navigate presidential immunity protections[2]
- 5The district court clarified that Trump was 'not being prosecuted for his view on a political dispute' but for 'acts constituting criminal conspiracy and obstruction of the electoral process'[1]
📚Read More
https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf
Jack Smith's Final Report on Trump Investigations (2025)
Jack Smith's final report on his criminal investigation of Donald Trump explains why he didn't pursue charges for inciting the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
The Superseding Trump Indictment Charts Jack Smith’s Path Forward
Smith has reworked the Jan. 6 case against Trump in light of the Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity.
← Swipe to see more →
More Trending on Twitter
🇹🇹
🇹🇹
by Lane Kiffin
Before the victory speech and celebrations on November 4, there were hours of anxious waiting as ...
Before the victory speech and celebrations on November 4, there were hours of anxious waiting as we watched the numbers come in. Here's a glimpse of it all, stress and joy alike. Thank you to every New Yorker who believed in this fight for working people. I am so proud to be sworn in as your Mayor tomorrow.
by Zohran Kwame Mamdani
Q: Can you tell us why you thought it was important to make a request for a public hearing? Jac...
Q: Can you tell us why you thought it was important to make a request for a public hearing? Jack Smith: The career public servants I worked with, who've been vilified by President Trump and the people who work for him. I think someone needs to speak up for them. https://t.co/ToWJCTo2eK
by Blue Georgia